• Expertise
  • Ingredient Solutions
  • Applications
  • Resources
    Resources
  • PLT People & Planet
  • About
    About

    Our international network, passionate team of experts and extensive industry knowledge is what sets us apart.

    Seth circle headshot
    Seth Flowerman
    President and CEO
Clinical Research

A comparative pharmacokinetic evaluation of caffeine in two different delivery vehicles in healthy adults

Citation: Kalman D, Hewlings S, Lee R, Foster R, Morton K. A comparative pharmacokinetic evaluation of caffeine in two different delivery vehicles in healthy adults. J Int Soc Sports Nutr 2018;15(Suppl1):52:A24.

Abstract:

Background: The purpose of this prospective pharmacokinetic (PK) study was to evaluate two different delivery systems for caffeine in healthy adults. Caffeine is found in foods, beverages and in dietary supplements. Athletes often utilize caffeine as an ergogenic aid for sport and mental performance. The timing of caffeine ingestion for ergogenic use has typically been centered on timing for events that commence within an hour of dosing, however for events of longer duration, caffeine dosing may not have the desired impact. Sustained or delayed release caffeine may have ergogenic use for athletes who engage in prolonged training or who want to customize their caffeine experience.

Materials and methods: In a prospective randomized two-way counterbalanced cross over pharmacokinetic trial, 12 healthy adults (35.8±11.62 y.o., BMI of 26.67 ±4.63 kg/m2, 7 males, 5 females) under standardized conditions were given either Immediate Release Caffeine 250mg (IR) or Extended Release Caffeine 250 mg (ER; zümXR®) with the opposite administered after a three-day washout. Subjects were dosed and plasma caffeine was measured over a 12 hr post-dose period. Plasma caffeine was measured by LC MS/MS (Keystone Bioanalytical). The PK profile for Tmax, Cmax and terminal ½ life was determined by linear mixed effects model. Standard statistical techniques were also used.

Results: Dissolution tests of the raw material revealed that the IR caffeine delivers 100% of the caffeine within1 hour. The ER caffeine (zümXR®) was found to deliver 26% caffeine by 1 hour and 79% by 6 hours. The Per Protocol analysis (n=12) revealed that the IR caffeine had a Cmax of 7.42 ± 1.78 ug/ml, Tmax of 1.0 hr and a half-life (t ½ h) of 6.38 ± 2.71 hr. In contrast, the ER caffeine (zümXR®) had a Cmax of 3.66 ± 1.13 ug/ml, a Tmax of 4.0 hr and a half-life (T ½ h) of 10.5± 5.12 hr.

Conclusions: This study demonstrated that the ER caffeine has a different and extended PK profile relative to the IR caffeine. The ER caffeine exhibited a 300% longer Tmax and 64.6% longer half-life than the IR caffeine. This human data supports the dissolution data, adding strength to the overall findings. ER caffeine such as zümXR® technology may have applications for athletes who desire extended circulating levels of caffeine.

Request a Copy of The Clinical Trial